Guest Post: On the Wings of a Dove?

J. Watkins is a long-time commenter on the site and someone off whom I often bounce ideas in the Ancient Studies room of the BYU Library. He defines himself in the following terms: “I’m Justin Watkins. I’m from Cardston, Alberta and I’m an undergraduate senior at BYU studying ancient near eastern studies. My focus is in the NT but I’d like to study
the LXX for my graduate work. I also love studying Church history as a hobby. I’ve been married nearly 4 years to my Aussie sweetheart, Sarah, who is my 4th grade teaching sugar momma. We have no kids. I fear that I am a true nerd in every sense of the word. On the LDS scale I’d say I fall just right of the middle as far as my views on doctrine and ethics go.”

I’ve been intrigued since my mission about the phrase from Matt. 3:16: “and
he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove and lighting upon him.”
(KJV) My current study of Matthew in Greek 311 has reraised the question
about exactly what this phrase means. For instance, Mark 1:10 uses similar
language: “and the Spirit like a dove descending upon him.” John 1:32 says:
“I saw the Spirit descending from heaven like a dove, and it abode upon
him.” But Luke says something different. Luke 3:22 says: “and the Holy
Ghost descended in a bodily shape like a dove upon him.” Our modern day
scriptures universally use the phrase “in the form of a dove.” (see 1 Ne.
11:27; 2 Ne. 31:8; D&C 93:15; Abr. Fac. 2, fig. 7)
Continue reading “Guest Post: On the Wings of a Dove?”

Historical Mormon Smackdown: Academic influence Edition!

Hello and welcome back. I have been thinking a lot about the influence of LDS academics on the landscape of our church. They do have influence, but is it enough or the right variety? What is the role of the LDS academic? Well, what better way to begin this than with a web-poll.

To that end, I was wondering if you feel that, since we’ve had LDS academics of one stripe or another since the 50’s, if they have had any influence on the leaders of the church? Certainly not the kind of influence that Christ has had (nor am I suggesting otherwise), but have they helped shape the way that the Brethren understand and teach LDS theology. I think yes, but I am not sure how much. With that bias in mind, we have the following:

Which LDS academic’s influence was most evident over conference: Hugh W. Nibley or Robert Millet?

Obviously, Hugh Nibley is the LDS scholar par excellance. Would we even have LDS scholarship without him? Probably, it would look and sound much differently. He is an essayist, theologian, ancient historian, firebrand, and mensch. He is particularly fond of the gospel as taught by President Brigham Young. Go here to read his article on Brigham Young in the Encyclopedia of Mormonism (you’ll need to scroll down).

Robert Millet was the dean of the BYU religion department . He is the author of several books, including the recent Another Jesus. He is partially responsible for the recent emphasis on grace in the church, as is evidenced here (Choose talk #11).

Please vote to the left and discuss below.

Cave of John the Baptist

This story relates progress in the excavation of Suba Cave, located about 15 miles west of Jerusalem. The link to the Baptist is controversial, resting mainly on some drawings on the walls and some evidence of baptisms. The real news is that this cave was a happenin’ place in the 7th century BCE, making it a feature of Isaiah’s era.

The original website is here. I totally recommend you click that link for the pictures. To my non-archeologist’s eye, the details of the enlargements are fascinating. I have enclosed the narrative below.

Continue reading “Cave of John the Baptist”

And the winner is…

The Restoration of the Priesthood has beaten the Book of Mormon in a poll of the most influential forces in today’s Mormonism. The final vote was 18-13. I would like to thank everyone who participated.

So, does this tell us anything interesting? Also, any suggestions for the return of Historical Mormon Smackdown next week?

March Mormon Doctrine Madness: Final Four winners!

And the winners are:

11 Restoration of Priesthood Authority 21
1 Joseph Smith 17

1 The Book of Mormon 26
6 Sacrament Meeting 10

So, the championship game tomorrow will be
1 The Book of Mormon vs. 11 Restoration of Priesthood Authority

Maybe this means good things for George Mason.

March Mormon Doctrine Madness: Final Four announcement [corrected]

The Elite Eight results are:

1 – Joseph Smith 23
9 – Gordon B. Hinckley 22

11 – Restoration of Priesthood Authority 24
12 – Saving Ordinances 11

1 – The Book of Mormon 31
8 – The 2nd Official Declaration 4

6 – Sacrament Meeting 26
10 – Relief Society 7

The final four matches are:

1 Joseph Smith vs. 11 Restoration of Priesthood Authority

1 Book of Mormon vs. 6 Sacrament Meeting

Wow! That Joseph Smith/Gordon B. Hinckley match came down to the wire (overtime, even)
[edited to reflect the actual bracket]
Also, after yesterday’s games, I suddenly don’t feel so bad about having an 11 seed make the final.

March Mormon Doctrine Madness: Elite Eight

1 – Joseph Smith vs. 9 – Gordon B. Hinckley

Which is the more influential force in Mormonism today
Joseph Smith
Gordon B. Hinckley
  
Free polls from Pollhost.com

11 – Restoration of Priesthood Authority vs. 12 – Saving Ordinances

Which is the more influential force in Mormonism today
Restoration of Priesthood Authority
Saving Ordinances
  
Free polls from Pollhost.com

1 – The Book of Mormon vs. 8 – The 2nd Official Declaration

Which is the more influential force in Mormonism today?
The Book of Mormon
The 2nd Official Declaration
  
Free polls from Pollhost.com

6 – Sacrament Meeting vs. 10 – Relief Society

Which is the more influential force in Mormonism today?
Sacrament Meeting
Relief Society
  
Free polls from Pollhost.com

Please Vote and Comment Below!